🔗 Share this article

These times showcase a quite unique phenomenon: the inaugural US parade of the overseers. They vary in their qualifications and traits, but they all share the identical objective – to stop an Israeli infringement, or even devastation, of the fragile peace agreement. Since the hostilities ended, there have been scant occasions without at least one of the former president's delegates on the territory. Only in the last few days featured the arrival of Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff, a senator and a political figure – all coming to execute their roles.

The Israeli government keeps them busy. In just a few short period it executed a set of attacks in the region after the deaths of a pair of Israeli military personnel – leading, as reported, in many of Palestinian injuries. Multiple officials urged a renewal of the fighting, and the Israeli parliament approved a preliminary decision to incorporate the occupied territories. The American reaction was somewhere between “no” and “hell no.”

Yet in several ways, the American government appears more intent on preserving the existing, tense period of the ceasefire than on progressing to the next: the rebuilding of the Gaza Strip. Concerning this, it appears the US may have aspirations but no concrete strategies.

Currently, it remains uncertain at what point the planned international administrative entity will effectively assume control, and the similar goes for the appointed security force – or even the composition of its soldiers. On Tuesday, a US official declared the US would not force the membership of the international unit on Israel. But if Benjamin Netanyahu’s cabinet continues to reject one alternative after another – as it did with the Ankara's suggestion lately – what follows? There is also the reverse issue: which party will establish whether the forces favoured by the Israelis are even prepared in the task?

The matter of the timeframe it will need to neutralize Hamas is similarly vague. “Our hope in the government is that the multinational troops is intends to at this point take charge in neutralizing Hamas,” stated Vance recently. “It’s may need a period.” Trump only emphasized the ambiguity, declaring in an interview on Sunday that there is no “rigid” timeline for Hamas to lay down arms. So, theoretically, the unnamed members of this still unformed international contingent could arrive in Gaza while Hamas fighters continue to remain in control. Are they confronting a leadership or a militant faction? These are just a few of the concerns surfacing. Others might wonder what the verdict will be for ordinary residents in the present situation, with Hamas persisting to attack its own adversaries and critics.

Current developments have afresh underscored the blind spots of Israeli reporting on each side of the Gaza border. Every source attempts to scrutinize every possible angle of Hamas’s violations of the ceasefire. And, in general, the fact that Hamas has been delaying the repatriation of the bodies of killed Israeli hostages has dominated the news.

On the other hand, attention of civilian casualties in the region resulting from Israeli strikes has obtained minimal focus – if at all. Consider the Israeli retaliatory attacks in the wake of a recent Rafah occurrence, in which a pair of soldiers were killed. While Gaza’s authorities stated dozens of fatalities, Israeli media pundits complained about the “moderate reaction,” which hit just facilities.

That is typical. Over the past few days, the press agency accused Israeli forces of breaking the peace with the group 47 times since the ceasefire was implemented, killing 38 individuals and wounding an additional 143. The assertion seemed unimportant to most Israeli news programmes – it was merely ignored. This applied to reports that 11 members of a local family were killed by Israeli troops a few days ago.

Gaza’s rescue organization said the family had been attempting to go back to their residence in the Zeitoun district of Gaza City when the vehicle they were in was attacked for allegedly crossing the “demarcation line” that marks zones under Israeli army authority. That limit is not visible to the ordinary view and appears solely on maps and in official records – sometimes not available to ordinary residents in the area.

Yet this occurrence barely got a mention in Israeli journalism. One source mentioned it briefly on its digital site, referencing an Israeli military spokesperson who explained that after a suspicious transport was identified, forces shot alerting fire towards it, “but the vehicle kept to move toward the troops in a manner that posed an immediate danger to them. The forces opened fire to neutralize the threat, in accordance with the truce.” Zero fatalities were claimed.

With this narrative, it is understandable numerous Israeli citizens feel Hamas alone is to responsible for infringing the peace. This belief risks encouraging appeals for a tougher stance in Gaza.

Eventually – maybe in the near future – it will no longer be sufficient for all the president’s men to act as supervisors, instructing the Israeli government what to refrain from. They will {have to|need