🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an international accord created to protect women from violence, covering domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense debates in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final decision now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to establish laws and support services to eliminate all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a decision that rights groups described as a significant regression for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Resistance

The treaty was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its focus on gender equality weakens traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, MPs decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the treaty, a action proposed by opposition parties but supported by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Divisions and Reactions

One of the primary parties supporting the exit is Latvia First, whose leader has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

The nation's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova urged the agreement not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent vote has provoked widespread outcry both within the country and internationally.

22,000 people have signed a national petition calling for the convention to be maintained. The gender equality group the rights center has called a demonstration for the coming week, charging MPs of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Possible Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a hasty decision fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty four years ago, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds majority, the head of state could potentially send back the legislation for further consideration if he holds objections.

Head of State Rinkevics stated on social media that he would assess the vote according to constitutional principles, "taking into account state and legal factors, instead of belief-based perspectives".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in Latvia but across the continent," commented a rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been rising in several EU nations
• The European treaty requires specific legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could influence comparable discussions in additional EU countries